It was 1971. What were any of us thinking! |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Allred
That is a beaut. I like the way the carbs are slanted forward and down as if to say to the motor,,,, "Chug this!" What was the main issues with the pre-unit models that brought in the unit construction? Was it just because the Jones's were doing it? . You meet some of the best folks behind bars. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Allred
The recent work from the ad; "New wheel bearings, petcocks, points, condenser, battery, and a shifter shaft (250 just for that) since everyone tries to use it as a brake. (shift on right, brake on left)" I was going to contact him to inquire but alas it is sold. Probably for the best. I really don't have the room for another bike right now. I have a few options on what to do about this dilemma. 1) Sell something. 2) Move some bikes to my work. 3) Build an out building on property next to the house. #1 is not my favorite option. #2 Is not a bad idea, I'm in the process of purchasing a commercial building that has a 3000 square foot out building that would make a perfect bike shop but it's 3 miles from. #3 makes the most since but it would take motorcycle money to accomplish plus the permit process and property tax sucks the life out of the fun of it. Why does the guberment have to be such a buzzkill? . You meet some of the best folks behind bars. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Allred
Okay,,, I have to say it,,,, I like the paint scheme. Though being called the Fury it doesn't fit. I would think a fire red or black and red would fit better. I'm not a fan of the robotic look of the motor but it sounds like it had some promise from the Wiki link. A stock 350cc that could reach 110mph sounds like they were heading in the right direction. A little too late. Pity. . You meet some of the best folks behind bars. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by motogrady
You guys had purple dots, Challengers and Hendrix. My generation had You won. . You meet some of the best folks behind bars. |
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by Fatfatboy
"Carb" singular, the A10 only ever had a single carb on production models.
A very good question! I think it must have been a "natural progressive step"....... although, Norton never took it! Maybe it was a corporate decision to upgrade what was an old separate gearbox design, a similar step was also taken by Triumph, although the new Triumph visually resembled the outgoing model, whereas the BSA was completely new. The pre-unit designs meant that to adjust the primary chain you have to loosen and slide the gearbox rearward, which in turn loosened the rear chain, which in turn meant the rear chain had to be adjusted by loosening the rear wheel and moving it rearward. But that was hardly a reason to design a completely new engine with all the re-tooling involved. Maybe the tooling for the old design was ready for replacement, and also maybe they were seeing the writing on the wall from the Japanese and had to produce a tidier, sleeker, more compact design, while at the same time designing it to be able to reliably produce more power. Looking at the A10 versus A65 I'm not sure the "improvements" were worth it, there wasn't any significant increase in power output, and I'm not sure the overall design was any sleeker. It did replace the archaic generator of the A10 with an alternator, but that could have been easily upgraded on the A10. Similarly they could have re-designed the A10 primary drive with a fixed duplex or triplex chain adjusted by a spring-loaded or internal tensioner. Norton took the virtually none committal step of retaining the pre-unit design, but introduced a "floating engine" to reduce vibration..........a factor that no one was complaining about anyway, large capacity parallel twins were supposed to vibrate! What was needed was a completely new design, something that cured the pre-unit look and also cured the vibration, and also boosted power output, and of course that would be the Triumph Trident and BSA Rocket III................desperately needed in light of the impending and world-changing Honda CB750 and soon-to-follow Kawasaki 900 Z1. . |
In reply to this post by Fatfatboy
As far as the robotic look of the motor, they were just too far ahead of the game imo. Look at the stuff out there today, say, 2000 and up. Especially the 250 and 450 dirt bike engines. Very close in appearance. Funny how things come and go. Seems like the crotch rocket thing is on the wane, and that British Rockers / Aces Cafe thing is coming back. |
Damn, and my old gear doesn't fit me any more!!! . |
This post was updated on .
Jay Leno's 1966 BSA Lightning. (wait, is that oil I see underneath it!!!!!) . |
^^^^^
Now that is a beautiful bike. |
The infamous BSA Dandy! Available from 1957 thru 1962. Using a 70cc two-stroke engine it could bounce its way to a maximum 30mph. The rear "suspension" consisted of the whole rear of the machine, including the engine, pivoting under control of two un-damped springs, hence the bouncy ride. The two speed gearbox was a strange, pre-select affair whereby you twisted the left grip to select a gear, but the mechanism didn't engage until the clutch lever was depressed and then released. Correct, and constant adjustment of the clutch cable was necessary to avoid a rough gear change. Ignition was via an energy-transfer system, the kicker being that the unit is housed inside the crankcase!!!! To adjust or replace the contact-breaker points you had to remove the engine and split the crankcases......I KID YOU NOT! It sold reasonably well initially, but there was strong competition from Yamaha's and Suzuki's excellent two stroke "step-thoughs", and Honda's hugely successful Super Cub, so needless to say, once its foibles were discovered sales dropped dramatically. . |
"Waitwaitwait...Who the fu.. Why the he...I mean how in the worl...."
How does every design element from the foot pegs back get approved and put into production???
Choose to Ride.
Supports splitting everywhere.
|
This post was updated on .
And believe it or not, it took two years of development from an Earl's Court (London) motorcycle show debut, to a showroom floor model. It took them that long to fine-tune those special features for an unsuspecting buying public! LOL! |
This post was updated on .
The BSA/Ariel 3..............it was sold as an Ariel, but was in fact a BSA product. I think the same design team that worked on the BSA Dandy must have be assigned for the next 8 years designing the ill-fated BSA/Ariel 3, for in 1970, they released a 50cc "leaning" tricycle moped. The whole front section of the machine would lean for going around corners, supported by two torsion bars. Drive from the 50cc two-stroke engine went to one of the two rear wheels. There was no electric start, there wasn't even a kick-start, you had to pedal the machine up to speed and drop the decompression lever to get the engine to fire!!!!! There was basically no rear suspension, and it had what was a glorified bicycle seat. Electrics were 6 volt, and the headlight had no high-beam. They were an absolute pig to work on, you couldn't get to anything without tearing the whole back end apart, it was a complete nightmare, and priced 25% more than any of the cute and reliable Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha 50cc step-thru's, predictably sales were poor. The development costs were £2,000,000 in 1970 pounds sterling, which is around $35,000,000 US in today's money, and it is frequently reported that it was what finished BSA financially. . |
This post was updated on .
Enough of ugly BSA's, here's a beautiful 1961 650cc A10 Super Rocket, with alloy gas tank, solo seat, rear-sets, clip-ons, swept-back exhaust pipes, chromed rear chain guard, alloy levers, bell-mouth and float-bowl extension. . |
^
I feel like I just got vaccinated... Thank you.
Choose to Ride.
Supports splitting everywhere.
|
Or, if singles are your want, then a DBD34 500cc Gold Star should meet those needs. Alloy gas tank, solo seat, lightweight alloy fenders, alloy wheel rims, nice double-sided 2LS front brake(s). . |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |