hacksaw wrote
Only the rider . The rest are safe and sound.
So what if it’s public? The public watch’s the race.
Nobody is forcing anyone to listen.
I think you are too much against one guy . Rather than thinking about all riders in general .
And it works both ways , fire the guy if they want to .
But if the bike truly sux , then it sux.
Well…..it’s not like the bikes aren’t close.
Sure, some do things better than others.
But it’s not like they are entering a bagger
in Motogp.
Some say it’s 80% rider, 20% bike.
Sure, the bike matters.
But, swap bikes of the series leader, the guy in his prime, with that
“I don’t give a crap I’m winning this” attitude, with a guy
mired in the mindset of “It’ll never work”,
see who beats who.
Thing is, a rider and a team enter into a kind of contract.
An understanding.
The team says they will do the best they can.
The rider usually says he’s ready, willing and able to give it his best shot.
No rider goes in saying, hey, if the bike is crap I’m gonna tell everyone.
No team goes in saying if your marriage breaks up or you learn how to freebase cocaine we’ll tell the world of your problems.
No, both parties are in it in the end to make money.
The team by selling bikes for the factory.
The rider by winning, or at least portraying a winner.
That doesn’t work out, keep your word,
and move on.